Thiemo Fetzer<p>I am going to share this as I think there is a much wider point to make. Last year, I studied the <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/Immensa" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Immensa</span></a> <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/Dantelabs" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Dantelabs</span></a> <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/COVID19" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>COVID19</span></a> testing scandal. </p><p>A large <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/PCR" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>PCR</span></a> lab basically produced tons of <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/FalseNegatives" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FalseNegatives</span></a> -- see my thread from last year:</p><p><a href="https://twitter.com/fetzert/status/1460166688423489538" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">twitter.com/fetzert/status/146</span><span class="invisible">0166688423489538</span></a></p><p>Today the <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/Inquiry" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Inquiry</span></a> results came out. Wrong equipment settings were to blame. This is what produced the <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/FalseNegatives" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FalseNegatives</span></a>. </p><p>More importantly, there is now an <a href="https://econtwitter.net/tags/Epidemiology" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Epidemiology</span></a> paper with *13* <br />@UKHSA<br />authors. Let's compare...<br /><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://a.gup.pe/u/economics" class="u-url mention">@<span>economics</span></a></span></p>