econtwitter.net is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
A Mastodon instance for Economists.

Administered by:

Server stats:

170
active users

With external vulnerabilities mounting, talking about as a enhancing platform for might sound ill-advised. It's not, if reforms are sequenced well. Right now, the priority should be to insulate . Why & how? 👇👇

RT @SDPIPakistan@twitter.com

Exporting is good for productivity in Pakistan, but importing is good too. Accessing technology is important for improving the overall economy.
@gonwei@twitter.com

🐦🔗: twitter.com/SDPIPakistan/statu

1) need access to at world prices to be . That's well established. Granting them that access leads to a net gain of forex (because the value of exports> imports needed to produce them).

Gonzalo Varela

2) Thus, countries across the world use duty drawbacks (refunds on import duties) or outright exemptions for exporters. So that you don't "export taxes". In , for example, 50% of access these drawbacks. In , less than 10%.

3) w/ @SDPIPakistan@twitter.com we conducted a pilot survey among 's that revealed that +60% of them waited more than 60 days to get refunds (sometimes not full refunds) even after applications had been approved. Results here: tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10

4) But even getting the application approved was complex: at least 20 documents. Complex filing biases the schemes against . Part of the problem is having to justify - conversion rates to .

5) Other countries make this process easier: Option a) use fixed input-output conversion rates by sector (no need for IOCO). b) use supervised , leveraging to calculate output conversions and identify those at risk of cheating. only those.

6) The costs of not doing it: stagnation, increased vulnerabilities, slowdown.